notion parallax

what happens when ideas slide past each other
  • Home
  • buy me books
  • i look at this
  • i read this
  • tutorials
21 Oct 2009

taking a crack at a policy

albatross chick full of plastic

This photo has been popping up all over the internet today. It has galvanised me into writing down an idea that I’ve been kicking about for a few weeks. I’ll try and be as structured as I can and rant as little as possible.

Starting with a pair of premises that I believe to be factual.

  1. Global fish stocks are severely depleated. I don’t know much about Pacific stocks, but I’d imagine that there is a similar situation to the Atlantic stocks.
  2. There are floating islands of plastic in the ocean gyres.

some that are slightly more open to debate, but I still consider to be facts.

  • There is likely to be a collapse of the fishing industry if fish stocks reach a terminal point in their populations.
  • They are also extremely heavily subsidised, up to 50% of the industries income is from subsidies.
  • Fish and other marine animals, particularly filter feeders, are being found with significant ammounts of plastic inside them.
  • Plastic in oceans degrades to smaller pieces of plastic as the polymer chains unwind from each other, but very rarely to monomers, or anything that can be digested.

So what can be done about this? Obviously, the simplest answer to the problem of the pastic is to stop putting it into the sea, but this is a global problem, and most of the plastic is not deliberatly put there.

Also we need to stop the part of fishing that involves taking fish out of the water and put some effort into trying to rebuild fish stocks. Probably somethign like 10 or 20 years of not fishing.

"Oh no!" I hear the cries from the fishing industry in disgust and terror for their livelyhoods. "You’ll bancrupt us, and even if you just pay us to stay at home* we’ll loose our craft – the next generation will become 7-11 staff". (*probably not that much more expensive than paying them to go and fish as the current subsidies do.)

My suggestion is that we should redirect the activities of the currently unprofitable fishing industry into fishing for plastic. The deep sea trawlers have the technology and infrastructure to go for long term trips to collect plastic waste. The low hanging fruit in this situation is the large pieces, i.e. plastic bags, detergent bottles, etc. so that’d be a good start. The onboard processing capacity could be put to use in catagorising the plastics, but also once the easy catch of large plastic is taken, the factory ships can set to work on filtering out the much smaller particles of plastic that are in suspention. This would maintain the fleet, and the fleet’s skills. The plastic that was landed could either be recycled or burnt to produce energy.

This would provide a rest for the fish, and also improve their habitat, so that when the stocks have sufficiently recovered, the polymer:meat ratio iside fish is a bit closer to what we’d hope it’d be.

I’ll probably revisit this as I get a bit better at scenario planning and future thinking. weigh in in the comments if you have anything at all to say, and if you are watching in black and white on facebook, go here to watch in green and white.

Tags: future, thinking

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 at 9:49 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “taking a crack at a policy”

  1. Heather Doherty says:
    October 23, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Your idea is quite good but two flaws which immediately spring to mind are:

    1. 1. by ‘fish’, you are particularly referring to the fish that we (the ‘west’) eat – we are very fussy fish eaters and we’re greedy too. Fishing communities in Vanuatu for example, eat what they catch. Obviously they have preferences but the idea of throwing fish back into the sea is fascicle. Also, their traditional methods of fishing means that only mature fish are caught. This, added to a rotational ‘hunting’ system, ensures the reproductive cycle isn’t broken.
    2. 2. Trawlers are bad, regardless of what they intend to collect, as there is no way of distinguishing between fish, plastic, mammals or anything for that matter.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

« The future is important – I’m going to live there soon.
coffee making »
  • Recent Posts

    • Humility collection
    • a weekend on wheels
    • emotionality…0
    • graphing legend status
    • Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings
  • Recent Comments

    • Ben: http://cafehayek.com/2011/12/m an-bites-dog.html Two top hurricane predictors are leaving the field because they...
    • Ben: http://road.cc/content/blog/49 070-cycling-london-getting-saf er An article by Jenny Jones about how she...
    • Ben: There’s another video from the night here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =LrzKx3Kepws Lots of pictures of...
    • josh: Hey, great tutorial. I’m looking forward to reading more
    • Bethan: “The certificate claims that I’m not a “total legend”, yay!”. Do you mean “now a total...
  • Tags

    advertising architecture australia bikes books BVN climbing coffee collaborative cool links diploma economics eco stuff ecotect enhancement flying food future gardening GC geek hardware house keeping interaction Judit late night life major study masters music processing rmit scooter smart geometry studio surfing teaching thinking toys trips turning japanese tutorials UTS video writing
notion parallax is powered by WordPress
Theme Design by Generic Designer

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.