notion parallax

what happens when ideas slide past each other
  • Home
  • buy me books
  • i look at this
  • i read this
  • tutorials
10 Apr 2010

UK emissions attributable to the built environment?

I’m trying to write about how much the built environment contributes to UK CO2 emissions, and i’m finding it to be very murky.

There is a figure of about 47 to 50%-ish but nobody references where they got this from, and nobody then subdivides it to show what that is made up of.

I’m on the bus at the moment, so i don’t really have access to the figures, but agriculture gets a big chunk, as does electricity generation, cement manufacturing gets a chunk, and transport gets a bit, and then the rest is left to ‘the built environment’.

As far as I can tell, if it has a roof, it is built environment. This means that that 50% that gets attributed to “something that architects really should be doing something about” includes everything from all the computers in offices around the country, to aluminium smelters (which consume so much electricity that they often have their own power station!).
What I’m after is the percentage of UK CO2 emissions that are attributable to buildings, broken down into useful chunks. How much power does the building consume? To run the lifts, the HVAC, the lights?

There are a lot of grey areas here, like how much architects should get involved with specifying the IT infrastructure, so that it produces less heat, and therefore allows a reduction in cooling loads, but for the moment I just want simple numbers.

Does anyone have anything they can push my way? There’s a pint/mars bar in it for you!!

Tags: emissions, major study, thinking

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 10th, 2010 at 2:27 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “UK emissions attributable to the built environment?”

  1. notion parallax – Chasing a made up number’s source… says:
    August 17, 2011 at 7:41 am

    [...] while ago I wrote about the magical 45% number that is cited whenever anyone tries to justify their involvement in a [...]

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

« Teaching texture mapping
architects’ pay? »
  • Recent Posts

    • Humility collection
    • a weekend on wheels
    • emotionality…0
    • graphing legend status
    • Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings
  • Recent Comments

    • Ben: http://cafehayek.com/2011/12/m an-bites-dog.html Two top hurricane predictors are leaving the field because they...
    • Ben: http://road.cc/content/blog/49 070-cycling-london-getting-saf er An article by Jenny Jones about how she...
    • Ben: There’s another video from the night here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =LrzKx3Kepws Lots of pictures of...
    • josh: Hey, great tutorial. I’m looking forward to reading more
    • Bethan: “The certificate claims that I’m not a “total legend”, yay!”. Do you mean “now a total...
  • Tags

    advertising architecture australia bikes books BVN climbing coffee collaborative cool links diploma economics eco stuff ecotect enhancement flying food future gardening GC geek hardware house keeping interaction Judit late night life major study masters music processing rmit scooter smart geometry studio surfing teaching thinking toys trips turning japanese tutorials UTS video writing
notion parallax is powered by WordPress
Theme Design by Generic Designer

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.